Legal Opinion

Drake v. Nickerson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 6, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

A Bath man gave a Holmes note, equivalent in effect to a chattel mortgage, in partial payment for the purchase price of a *12truck. As a part of the same contract he promised that he would keep the truck insured for the payee’s benefit. His policies of insurance, in this respect and otherwise, were issued from the plaintiff’s agency, to which he continued to be indebted for the premiums.

In mortgaging his right to redeem from the Holmes note, as security for the payment of his note to a bank, no obligation to insure was incurred.

When the Holmes note had been substantially reduced in amount it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Earle v. MaxwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  2. Weeks v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harvey v. AnaconeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  2. Mac Motor Sales, Inc. v. PateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  3. Gallagher v. Aroostook Federation of FarmersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  4. In re CohnDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API