Legal Opinion
Rahman v. Matador Villa Associates
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 17, 1991No. 73837PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLSTEIN, Judge.
The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s personal injury action because, in a previous action between the parties, it was not asserted as a compulsory counterclaim under Rule 55.32(a). Plaintiff appeals. Following an opinion by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, affirming the dismissal, this Court ordered the matter transferred here. Reversed and remanded.
Defendants, a Missouri general partnership, filed on July 29, 1987, in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, an action against plaintiff for rent and possession under Chapter 535, RSMo 1986. The matter was heard…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Exchange National Bank of Jefferson City v. WolkenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Osborne v. GoekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Lankheit v. Estate of SchererMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Ellinwood v. Estate of LyonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sanders v. SandersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Manor Square, Inc. v. Heartthrob of Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Becker Glove International, Inc. v. Jack Dubinsky & SonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- State ex rel. Cardinal Realty Services, Inc. v. SchoeberlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- KMS, Inc. v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Fielder v. Credit Acceptance Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.