Legal Opinion

John Jay Hooker v. Governor Bill Haslam

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2014No. M2012-01299-SC-R11-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE SPECIAL SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

ANDRÉE S. BLUMSTEIN, Sp. C.J.,

delivered the opinion of the Special Supreme Court,

in which W. MORRIS KIZER, J. ROBERT CARTER, JR., MONICA N. WHARTON, and JAMES R. DEDRICK, Sp. JJ„ joined.

We granted permission to appeal to determine whether certain provisions of the Tennessee Plan, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 17-4-101 through 17-4-109 (2009), which governs the way in which Tennessee appellate judges are initially selected and thereafter stand for reelection, violate the Tennessee Constitution. We hold that the issue of the constitutional validity of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. George v. HaslamDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
  2. Andrews, Torey v. Yates Services, LLCTennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2017
  3. Carlton J. Ditto v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024
  4. Cedarius M. v. State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
  5. Clark D. Frazier v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API