Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clark D. Frazier v. State of Tennessee

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2016No. M2014-02374-SC-R11-ECNPublished

1DissentSharon G. Lee, C.J.

I respectfully disagree with the Court’s decision. In my view, this Court should apply the doctrine of stare decisis, adhere to its previous reasoning in Wlodarz v. State, 361 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn.2012), and hold that the writ of. error coram nobis under Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-26-105 (2014) may be used in a collateral attack on a guilty plea.

The principle of stare decisis, that the Court should follow precedential decisions, is “a foundation stone of the rule of law.”.

Kimble v. Marvel Entm’t, LLC, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2401, 2409, 192 L.Ed.2d 463 (2015) (quoting Michigan v. Bay Mills…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. State v. VasquesTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API