Legal Opinion
Abdul-Haqq v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 2, 2022No. 3:19-cv-03727Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMILAH ABDUL-HAQQ, Case No. 3:19-cv-03727-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE CALIFORNIA NURSES ASSOCIATION 10 PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 132, 135 11 Defendants. 12 13 The Court’s motion to dismiss order allowed pro se plaintiff Abdul-Haqq to pursue a duty 14 of fair representation claim against her union, the California Nurses Association (CNA), solely on 15 the basis of alleged bad faith. Dkt. No. 82 (citing Burkevich v. Air Line Pilots Assoc. Int’l., 894
16 F.2d…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Gold Kist, Inc. v. Laurinburg Oil Company, Inc. And McNair EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.