Legal Opinion
United States v. Gleason
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 5, 1966No. 64 Cr. 348PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FRANKEL, District Judge.
The three defendants are charged in a multi-count indictment with income tax evasion. Defendants Gleason and Karp were business partners during the years in question. Pitkin was their accountant. Karp has moved for a severance under Rule 14 and for discovery and inspection under Rule 16, Fed.R.Crim.P.
1. In her motion for severance, defendant Karp asks that she be tried separately from defendant Pitkin. As grounds for such relief, she and her attorney have filed affidavits asserting that, as accountant for her and Gleason, Pitkin “handled all of their tax…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. BornholdtNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- James L. Byrd v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Florida Division of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. E. Graydon Shuford, United States of America v. Herman S. Jordan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Martin Judson Smith, Jr. And John Thomas Lott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.