Legal Opinion
Sandoz, Inc. v. Leavitt
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 10, 2006No. Civil Action 05-1810 (RMU)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently before the court is the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and the defendant’s 1 cross-motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff challenges the defendant’s inaction in processing the plaintiffs application for a new drug application for the drug Omnitrope. The plaintiff claims that the defendant’s delay in acting on the plaintiffs drug application violates a statutory requirement that the defendant act within 180 days…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hill Dermaceuticals, Inc. v. U.S. Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007