Legal Opinion

Kent v. Livingstone

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 2, 1936No. 6520PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, plaintiffs below, sued to restrain appellees, defendants below, from foreclosing and selling, under a deed of trust, certain apartment house property owned by plaintiffs. The gro.und of suit is that the notes secured by the deed of trust were infected with usury and had, in law, been fully paid.

The bill charged that Mrs. Kent, the owner of the property, had obtained, through appellee Kenneth M. Livingstone, a $5,000 loan on the property, the loan being evidenced by five notes of $1,000 each, and had paid Livingstone a bonus in the amount of $1,000. Subsequently a part of the debt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holman v. RyonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
  2. Spruill v. BallardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
  3. W. A. H. Church, Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. Earll v. PickenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Young v. RidleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1970
  4. Rothenberg v. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. (In Re Rothenberg)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  5. Realty Investment & Securities Corp. v. H. L. Rust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API