Legal Opinion
Cales v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided May 28, 2013No. Case No. 12-CV-37-ABJPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING HALLIBURTON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALAN B. JOHNSON, District Judge.
After a handrail on a piece of Halliburton Energy Services’s equipment collapsed on and pinned Dennis Sabe, Kevin Cales managed to lift it off but tore some cartilage in his ribs and slipped a disc in his back in the process. Seeking to recover for those injuries, Kevin and Ann Cales brought negligence and loss-of-consortium claims against Halliburton, contending Halliburton’s negligence placed Mr. Sabe in danger and that Mr. Cales can recover under the rescue doctrine. Halliburton has now filed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.