Legal Opinion

Hale v. City and County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 28, 1966No. 21514PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

We refer to plaintiffs in error as the plaintiffs or by name, and to defendants in error as the defendants or Denver.

Plaintiffs Hale and Cox are the owners of Lots 42 and 46, Block 13, Val verde, in the City and County of Denver which they purchased in January of 1956. They erected thereon a store building, setting the front of it back from the lot line a distance of about six feet. Plaintiff Surplus Tools and Commodities, Inc., is a Colorado corporation owned and controlled by the plaintiffs Hale and Cox. That corporation is the lessee of the premises above described on which it operates a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarty v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  2. Allen v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  3. Champlin Refining Co. v. CruseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  4. Denver v. SchmidSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yarbro v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Roeder v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1991
  4. Yarbro v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API