Legal Opinion

City of Emporia v. Juengling

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1908No. 15,646PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Lyon. district court; Frederick A. Meckel, judge.

1Per curiam

William Juengling was injured by falling from a dray on which he was riding in a street of Emporia. He brought an action against the city for damages, claiming that his fall was occasioned by a wheel striking the cover of a manhole which had been negligently permitted to project about eight inches *596above the level of the highway. He recovered judgment, and the defendant prosecutes error.

It is contended that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the city, but the argument in support of this contention goes rather to the credibility of the testimony given by one of the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Coughlen v. Chicago, Iowa & Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frank v. MatthiesenOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hecht Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Stone v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  4. Downs v. FosseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API