Legal Opinion

Haskins Bros. & Co. v. Morgenthau

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 1936No. 6710PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, Associate Justice.

Appellant, an Iowa corporation, is engaged in the manufacture of soap. Its business is intrastate. In the manufacture of its product it uses large quantities of Philippine coconut oil, and this use constitutes a “first domestic processing” under the terms of section 602½ of the Revenue Act of 1934. 1 The act imposes a tax of 3 cents per pound on the first domestic processing of certain vegetable oils, including coconut oil, and an additional tax of 2 cents per pound on the first domestic processing of coconut oil not produced in the Philippines. Appellant brought its…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Belknap v. SchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Banco De Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Rittenberg v. Donohoe Const. Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Clackamas County, Ore. v. McKayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. Osage Tribe of Indians v. IckesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942
  5. Flatow v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API