Legal Opinion
In Re Eaton
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 10, 1987No. 17962-4-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Darrah, J. *
This is an action under RCW 13.32A, Procedures for Families in Conflict. The Washington Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) appeals an order requiring it to place Daniel Eaton at a specific treatment facility and a contempt order. DSHS contends the juvenile court exceeded its statutory authority both in ordering the placement and in awarding the parents and child their attorney fees. We affirm the placement but reverse the attorney fee award.
In October 1985, Daniel Eaton's mother petitioned for an alternative residential placement (ARP) pursuant to RCW 13.32A.150. 1 An…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PascalWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Safeco Insurance v. MeyeringWashington Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re EatonWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004