Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Crowell Publishing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The action is one for damages for the unauthorized use of plaintiff’s name in violation of sections 50 and 51 of the Civil Rights Law. The statute requires that written consent first be obtained in order to justify the use of one’s name or picture for the purposes of trade. Defendant pleads as a separate and complete defense that consent was given by a course of conduct, and seeks to assert an estoppel based on such conduct. It repeats the facts so pleaded in an additional partial defense in mitigation of damages. In view of the express statutory requirement for written consent, we deem the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brinkley v. CasablancasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Adrian v. UntermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Lane v. F. W. Woolworth Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Lomax v. New Broadcasting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  5. Roberts v. Condé Nast Publications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API