Mary Katherine Day-Petrano & David Frank Petrano v. John Miller et al.
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion
United States District Court Middle District of Florida Jacksonville Division MARY KATHERINE DAY-PETRANO & DAVID FRANK PETRANO, Plaintiffs, v. NO. 3:26-cv-519-JEP-PDB JOHN MILLER ET AL., Defendants. Order This order addresses a pending motion, prosecution of the action, and required disclosure statements. 1. The court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a third-amended complaint because the motion violated Local Rules 1.08 and 3.01(g), and the proposed third-amended complaint violated Rule 8, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 52 at 5. The court provided this explanation:…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alba v. MontfordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Adem A. Albra v. Advan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Miller v. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.