Legal Opinion

Mary Katherine Day-Petrano & David Frank Petrano v. John Miller et al.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided September 24, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00519Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court Middle District of Florida Jacksonville Division MARY KATHERINE DAY-PETRANO & DAVID FRANK PETRANO, Plaintiffs, v. NO. 3:26-cv-519-JEP-PDB JOHN MILLER ET AL., Defendants. Order This order addresses a pending motion, prosecution of the action, and required disclosure statements. 1. The court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a third-amended complaint because the motion violated Local Rules 1.08 and 3.01(g), and the proposed third-amended complaint violated Rule 8, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 52 at 5. The court provided this explanation:…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Alba v. MontfordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Adem A. Albra v. Advan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Miller v. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API