Legal Opinion
Hearring v. Reubart
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 19, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00377Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 FRANK HEARRING, Case No. 3:22-cv-00377-LRH-CSD 7 Petitioner, v. ORDER 8 WILLIAM REUBART, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 11 Petitioner Frank Hearring has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1 12 (“Petition”)) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2), 13 and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4). This habeas matter is before the 14 Court for initial review under the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. For the reasons discussed 15 below, the Court grants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.