Legal Opinion

Decker v. City of Hampton, Va.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided June 8, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-162-NNPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DOUMAR, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a detective for the Hampton Police Division, brought this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 alleging that the defendants have deprived him of his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection by promulgating and enforcing Regulation 5.12 of the Hampton Police Division Rules and Regulations. Regulation 5.12 places limits on the outside employment of police officers by making such employment subject to the approval of the Chief of Police. On April 12, 1989, the plaintiff, a licensed private investigator,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walter Powers v. City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. State Troopers Non-Commissioned Officers Ass'n v. New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  3. Hulstrunk v. Ultracell Insulation, LLCVermont Superior Court · 2018
  4. Hulstrunk v. Ultracell Insulation, LLCVermont Superior Court · 2018
  5. Opinion No. (1997), California Attorney General Reports1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API