Legal Opinion
Terukuni Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd. v. Rittenberry & Associates, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 27, 1978No. 78 Civ. 1086 (RLC)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Defendant C.R. Rittenberry and Associates, Inc. (“Rittenberry”) moves, under F.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and (3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), for dismissal or transfer of the action to the Northern District of Oklahoma on the grounds that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant and that venue is improper in this district, or alternatively, under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for transfer to Oklahoma on the grounds that the convenience of parties and witnesses and the interest of justice so require. 1 It is unnecessary to resolve defendant’s contentions…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- James H. McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Company, International Brotherhood of Electricalworkers, Local 605 Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- James Corke v. Sameiet M. S. Song of Norway, Royal Caribbean Cruise Line A/s Royal Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., and Per Oslebye, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Fennell v. BacheSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Phillips v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Datasouth Computer Corp. v. Three Dimensional Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1989
- First City National Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Nemeroff v. AbelsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. ESCO Corp.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2012
- Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. DockeryDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.