Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Highland Boy Gold Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1904No. 1557PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County. — Ho». S. W. Stewart, Judge. Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries, which the plaintiff claims-he received because of the negligence of the defendant. In the complaint, so far as material to this decision, it is alleged that on January 28, 1902, the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant company at. its smelting works, and while so in its employ was ordered by defendant to assist in passing crushed ore from a certain ore bin, through chutes, into an ore car; that previously the plaintiff had been employed as a helper in the roasting department, but had not until that day assisted in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harley v. Buffalo Car Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Hamilton v. Rich Hill Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Nesbit v. Town of GarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. Combs v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  5. Brunker v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Great Western Coal & Coke Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Evansen v. Grande Ronde Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. O'Brien v. Las Vegas & T. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  4. Lee v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API