Legal Opinion
Rasberg v. Nationwide Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 1, 1987No. C-2-84-628Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GRAHAM, District Judge.
The present case is one brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and Section 4101.17(A), Ohio Revised Code.
Nationwide Life Insurance Company, defendant herein, maintains a small fleet of jet aircraft for transporting company executives, employees and clients. Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a pilot until he reached the age of sixty-two. At that time, plaintiff was forced to retire under defendant’s corporate policy of mandatory retirement for pilots upon attaining the age of sixty-two.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. CriswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Usery v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.