Legal Opinion

Continental Can Co. Inc. v. Lanesboro Canning Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1930No. 27,769PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This action for the price of goods sold, tried without a jury, resulted in a decision against Lanesboro Canning Company, a corporation, the principal debtor, and the individual defendants as its guarantors. The latter appeal from an order denying their motion for amended findings or a new trial.

During the involved period the canning company ivas a corpor-,' ation engaged in the business of canning corn and other vegetables at Lanesboro. Each season as they were needed it purchased its cans from plaintiff. Such purchases were made under three-year contracts. Before the cans for the season of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taney v. HodsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monroe Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. v. Westcor Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Borg Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Shakopee Sports Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Schumacher Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Borg Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Shakopee Sports Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Tri-County State Bank of Ortonville v. Golf Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API