Legal Opinion
Beyda v. Helmsley Enterprises, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Marble & Terrazo Polishing Corp. appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garson, J.), dated March 20, 1997, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Marble & Terrazo Polishing Corp., and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
The plaintiff contends…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trimarco v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Murphy v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Silver v. BrodskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Kline v. . AbrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Pizzi v. Bradlee's Division of Stop & Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Guarino v. La Shellda Maintenance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Ambrosio v. South Huntington Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Beyda v. Helmsley Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Matone v. DGM Partners Rye Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Murray v. Global Industrial Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002