Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Conner

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1994PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

In each case, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

These actions were commenced in April 1990, by Stephanie and Lyndon Murphy, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on June 15, 1987 by plaintiff Stephanie Murphy when she slipped and fell on the floor of Eastowne Mall, owned by defendant City of Elmira, and, at the time of plaintiff’s incident, operated and maintained by the Elmira Urban Renewal Agency. The issue here is whether the Appel late Division erred in reversing the motion court and granting summary judgment to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trimarco v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Kline v. . AbrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Diaz v. New York Downtown HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Frye v. Montefiore Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Pena v. Women's Outreach Network, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Ruggiero v. Waldbaums Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Portanova v. Trump Taj Mahal AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API