Legal Opinion
Independent Oil Workers at Paulsboro v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 12, 1971No. 19026PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*652OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, District Judge.
It is now firmly established that the policy of Federal Labor Law is to favor arbitration1 of disputes between labor and management, but since neither Congress nor the Supreme Court has gone so far as to require this procedure in all cases, the sine qua non is a contract between the parties which binds them to this extra-judicial method of resolving disputes.2
Our inquiry in this case narrows to the single issue of whether the agreement between the parties requires mandatory arbitration, as the Company contends, or whether the procedure is merely…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nevets C.M., Inc. v. Nissho Iwai American Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Matter of Bevill, Bresler & Schulman AssetDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- D.R. v. East Brunswick Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Air Master Sales Co. v. Northbridge Park Co-Op, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Affiliated Food Distributors, Inc. v. Local Union No. 229Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.