Legal Opinion
Meinhard-Commercial Corp. v. Sydney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 21, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Orest V. Maresca, J.), entered September 13, 1984, in an action by a commercial factor to recover damages as a result of credit extended on the basis of financial statements prepared by the defendants, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action pursuant to CPLR 3Í211 (a) (5), (7), reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action is denied.
This is an action by a factor seeking to recover damages allegedly sustained when it extended credit to Norstan Industries,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Credit Alliance Corp. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- European American Bank & Trust Co. v. Strauhs & KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Internationale Nederlanden (U.S.) Capital Corporation v. Bankers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Santiago v. 1370 Broadway Associates, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Fleet Factors Corp. v. WerblinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Port Authority v. Evergreen International Aviation, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.