Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carroll v. Jackson National Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 28, 1991No. 1665Published

1Concurrence

Sanders, Chief Judge (concurring):

In the first place, I would state the issue differently or, at least, more elaborately. In my opinion, we are called upon to decide whether the insurance company must prove a causal connection between the misrepresentation by the deceased *496and his death or whether, on the other hand, the company must prove only that it would not have issued the policies if the deceased had not misrepresented the state of his health. It seems to me that the company should be required to prove only the latter, not the former.

Quite obviously, in deciding whether to issue a life…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  2. McLeod v. Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Givens v. Steel Structures, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Ferguson v. R. F. Moore Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Fowler v. Canal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API