Legal Opinion
Celina Mutl. Ins. v. Saylor
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
Decided January 12, 1973No. A-723212PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKbaet, J.
This matter came before the court on a Complaint for declaratory judgment. The plaintiff issued to the defendant, Conrad Saylor, a certain family automobile insurance policy No. 2788938 and defendant, Thelma Saylor, wife of Conrad Saylor, was an insured under said policy.
Part IV of the policy is captioned “Protection Against Uninsured Motorists” and coverage J, a section therein, reads as follows:
“To pay ail sums which the insured or his legal representative shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile because of bodily injury, sickness…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Rothman v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Commonwealth Casualty Co. v. HeadersOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Murray v. LandenbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Wallis & CompaniesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Wendell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Sciascia v. American Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Race v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.