Legal Opinion

Huggins v. Hynes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 30, 2004No. 03-55446PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Harold Huggins, a former student at the University of California at Santa Barbara, appeals pro se the district court’s orders: (1) finding him to be a vexatious litigant; (2) denying his motion to amend a complaint; and (3) denying his motion for a discovery order. These orders all relate to a lawsuit stemming from Huggins’s allegations that university officials graded him based on race and worked to force him out of the engineering department. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion a vexatious litigant order, De Long v. Hennessey,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Norman HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Clifford Matley Family TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. (PC) Luedtke v. GriesbachDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. Aydin Kocataskin v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
  3. Bruzzone v. United States Attorney of Northern California DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  4. Council for Educ. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  5. Drevaleva v. GlazerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API