Roggen v. Roggen
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
When the parties to this divorce action moved to Nevada, they purchased a condominium in Mrs. Roggen’s name. Thereafter, Mrs. Roggen filed for divorce, claiming the Regency Towers condominium as her sole and separate property, and seeking distribution of the parties’ community property.
Mr. Roggen takes this appeal from provisions of the divorce decree confirming the condominium as Mrs. Roggen’s sole and separate property and valuing the parties’ businesses at $334,641. He seeks a new trial to establish the value of the businesses, arguing that trial court relied upon stale financial…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Petition of FullerNevada Supreme Court · 1945
- Kelly v. KellyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Carlson v. McCallNevada Supreme Court · 1954
- Zahringer v. ZahringerNevada Supreme Court · 1960
- Burdick v. PopeNevada Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Forrest v. ForrestNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Truax v. TruaxNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Verheyden v. VerheydenNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Estate of Hass v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986