Legal Opinion

Verheyden v. Verheyden

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1988No. 18214PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Per Curiam 1 ;

Appellant William Verheyden claims that the district court erred in two respects: (1) by awarding to his wife, respondent Camille, a $19,125.00 interest in a residence owned by him as his separate property; and (2) by awarding to Camille, on the ground that it was a gift from William, the 1982 Honda automobile jointly owned by the parties. We agree with William and reverse the trial court’s judgment with respect to both the house and the car.

The House

The house in question, located at 4861 Santa Barbara Street, Las Vegas, was acquired by William in January 1981, before he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barrett v. FrankeNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Todkill v. TodkillNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Milisich v. HillhouseNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Sly v. SlyNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Robison v. RobisonNevada Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Anderson v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. IN RE: COLMAN FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TR.Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
  4. In Re: Colman Family Revocable Living Tr.Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
  5. In the Interest of D.M.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API