Legal Opinion
First City Bank v. National Credit Union Administration
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided September 13, 1995No. 3:94-0334PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, District Judge.
Facts
Plaintiffs First City Bank and Tennessee Bankers Administration have brought suit against Defendants National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”), AEDC Federal Credit Union (“AEDC”), Tennessee Credit Union League and Credit Union National Association, Inc., claiming NCUA incorrectly interpreted the “common bond” provision of the Federal Credit Union Act (“FCUA”), giving AEDC arid other credit unions an unfair and illegal competitive advantage against banks. Both Plaintiffs and Defendants have filed for summary judgment.
The FCUA’s common bond provision…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First City Bank v. National Credit Union Administration BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- First City Bank v. National Credit Union Administration BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- First City Bank v. National Credit Union Administration BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997