Legal Opinion

Sturdivant v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1988No. 84-522PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

This case presents the question whether the warrantless search of an attic crawl space above appellant’s bedroom was permissible under the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant clause of the Fourth Amendment. The trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress the evidence found in the crawl space. After a jury trial, at which that evidence was presented, appellant was convicted of one count of armed robbery, D.C.Code §§ 22-2901, -3202 (1981 & 1987 Supp.), and two counts of possession of a prohibited weapon, D.C. Code § 22-3214 (1981). Because we conclude…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Garay v. LirianoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Settles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API