Legal Opinion

State v. Walker

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1994No. 21201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

A defendant who is placed on supervised probation is required by statute in Idaho to pay up to $35 per month for the costs of *509supervision, when financially able to do so.1 The instant case presents the- question of whether the State must refund to a defendant the amount the defendant paid for supervised probation when the conviction and sentence under which the defendant was placed on probation is subsequently reversed on appeal and the underlying criminal charge is dismissed. The district court below held that the defendant was entitled to a refund. The State has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Shrives v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. O'Loughlin v. Circle a ConstructionIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. NoelColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. SteedCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API