Legal Opinion

David A. Hill v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1967No. 21126PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge:

David A. Hill, appellant herein, and Andrew H. Miller were charged in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, with having “on or about November 10, 1965 * * * knowingly sold and facilitated the sale * * * of marihuana, which said marihuana, as the defendant then and there well knew, theretofore had been imported and brought into the United States contrary to law.” 1 Appellant was convicted by a jury and sentenced to a term of imprisonment. He appealed to this court which has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. Eugene JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Frank Anthony Cellino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Laurence Fredrick Anthony v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Martorano, Raymond, A/K/A Lon JohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Donald Rudolph Gardner, United States of America v. Donald Neal Le BoulangerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. Robert Claude Beckett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Rene Delgado BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Charles Gary, Milton WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API