South Carolina State Highway Department v. Schrimpf
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentBussey, Justice
It is with regret that I find myself unable to concur in the majority opinion in this case.
The questions involved in this appeal are somewhat variously stated by the parties in their respective briefs, but the basic contentions of the appellants are, (1) that the entry of a judgment on the verdict was improper, and (2) that, regardless of whether or not the judgment was properly entered, the landowner is not entitled to recover interest on the verdict from the date thereof to the date of payment. The respondent challenges the foregoing contentions of the appellant and further expressly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Haig v. Wateree Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Florida Livestock Board v. GladdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.