Alford Embry
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Alford Embry seeks leave to file a successive motion to vacate or lower his sentence. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Invoking Johnson v. United States, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), which voided for vagueness the residual clause of a sentencing statute (the Armed Career Criminal Act), he claims a right to relief because the district court treated him as a career offender under an identically worded clause of the Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2)). In one sense, there is something to be said for his request. For United States v. Pawlak, 822…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jerome Raybon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- In re ConzelmannCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Willie Jones, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Brian Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.