Legal Opinion

Smolka v. James T. Chandler & Son, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 9, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, Chief Justice:

This is a writ of error to review a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Maintaining the designations of the parties below, the plaintiff, an undertaking establishment, sued the defendant personally to recover its charges for the funeral expenses of one Peter Djreka, who died on June 14, 1938. The defendant was the stepson of the deceased, and the executor of his will. The declaration consisted of appropriate common counts, and attached was a bill of particulars headed, “Estate of Peter Djreka, 109 Poplar Street”.

Evidence introduced on behalf of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ferrin v. . MyrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Golden Gate Undertaking Co. v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Furry v. O'ConnorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Durkin v. LangleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. G. D. Ray & Son Ex Rel. Young v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. WillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. In Re Kneebs'estateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  3. Chase v. Morningside State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  4. Nolte v. NolteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Connor v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API