Trust Co. v. . Benbow
Supreme Court of North Carolina
On petition for rehearing. For former opinion, see 131 N. C., 413.
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, C. J., and MONTGOMERY, J., dissenting. This case is now before us on a petition to rehear. After the most careful consideration we are forced to the opinion that the petition should be allowed and the judgment of the court below affirmed, as we find no substantial error in the record. We do not think it necessary to discuss any exceptions other than those decided in the former opinion (131 N.C. 413). The plaintiff offered to read in evidence certain parts of the testimony of D. W. C. Benbow and of the statement of Mrs. Mary E. Benbow given in supplementary proceedings. Upon objection…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Runkle v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Purnell v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Gore v. . TownsendSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bethell v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Linebarger v. Linebarger.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Vann v. Edwards.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- American Blower Co. v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- In re MunfordDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.