Legal Opinion

State v. Cornell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1929No. 21632. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendant, Cornell, was charged by information filed in the superior court for Chelan county with the offense of unlawfully having in his possession a narcotic drug, which drug had been unlawfully acquired by him in Chelan county. Trial in the superior court, sitting with a jury, resulted in a verdict finding Cornell guilty as charged. His counsel then moved for a new trial upon the ground, among others, of “insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict.” This motion was, by the court, granted, and an order entered accordingly, awarding Cornell a new trial, and specifically…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Danielson v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Getty v. HuttonWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Applewhite v. WayneWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Maddock v. McNivenWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Shead v. RiserWashington Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Barnes v. J. C. Penney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Kimball v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API