Legal Opinion
W. R. Grace & Co. v. National Wholesale Grocery Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 24, 1925PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract to recover damages for breach of contract in refusing to take and pay for sugar. The parties entered into a contract in writing whereby the plaintiff sold and the defendant bought about eighty tons of “Brazilian Washed Sugar,” to be shipped from Brazil. The defendant refused to accept the sugar tendered by the plaintiff in performance of the contract. The case was referred to an auditor “to hear the parties and *253their evidence and report his findings to the court, and his findings of fact shall be final.” Motion to recommit the auditor’s report was denied. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Stoops v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Leavitt v. Fiberloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Keller v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Martin v. JablonskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Bruns v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Lunn & Sweet Co. v. WolfmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Nelson v. HamlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.