Legal Opinion

Henry Roop v. Southern Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2016No. 2014-CA-00551-SCTPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Chief Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Henry Roop; sued Southern Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“SPC”) and its principal owners, individually, claiming, he has been terminated for reporting illegal activity, namely a kickback scheme to be carried out through a straw employee. SPC countered that it: fired Roop for, among other things, not meeting his contract goals for the year. A jury found SPC wrongfully terminated Roop for reporting illegal activity, and the jury awarded Roop compensatory damages. The circuit court entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in SPC’s favor. The circuit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. McArn v. Allied Bruce-Terminix Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Steele v. Inn of Vicksburg, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lawson v. Honeywell International, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Michael Nero v. Industrial Molding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. American Optical Corporation v. Robert Lee Rankin, Jr.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Elsie Smith v. Union Carbide CorporationMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Steel Dynamics Columbus, LLC v. Altech Environment USA Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2017
  4. William Mack, Jr. v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  5. American Optical Corporation v. Robert Lee Rankin, Jr.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API