Legal Opinion

People v. Class

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1984PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kaye, J.

A police officer’s nonconsensual entry into an individual’s automobile to determine the vehicle identification number violates the Federal and State Constitutions where it is based solely on a stop for a traffic infraction (US Const, 4th Arndt; NY Const, art I, § 12).

On May 11, 1981, in the late afternoon, Police Officers Lawrence Meyer and William McNamee observed defendant driving 5 to 10 miles per hour above the speed limit, in a car with the windshield cracked on the passenger side. The officers drove alongside defendant’s car and instructed him to pull over.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. New York v. ClassSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. TorresNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API