Legal Opinion

Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 13, 1954No. 626-52PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff sues to recover $100,571-.25 with interest thereon as provided by law. The principal sum represents the income tax assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and paid by plaintiff on the $402,285 difference between the amount at which plaintiff purchased 6,500 shares of its capital stock from a deceased official in 1939 and the amount at which it sold and reissued the stock to other officials during its fiscal year ending July 31, 1944. Plaintiff takes the position that no taxable long term capital gain resulted from the transaction because plaintiff was not…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Helvering v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Earle v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SA Woods MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Duncan Industries, Inc., etc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. United States v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Hercules Powder Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  4. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Penn-Texas Corporation (Formerly Colt's Manufacturing Company) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API