Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Hansen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 1994No. 92-02086; CA A80326PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that SAIF is barred from denying claimant’s claim on the ground that claimant was not a subject worker at the time of his injury.

The facts are not in dispute. In 1987, claimant was part owner, director and president of Hansen Floor Covering. The law did not require that he be covered by workers’ compensation insurance, and he did not elect coverage under ORS 656.039. In March, 1987, claimant injured his knee on the job, and filed a claim with SAIF. SAIF’s records show that, in April, 1987, SAIF had concluded that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Oak Crest Care Center v. BondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Garcia v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Camlu Retirement Center v. EvenhusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Messmer v. Deluxe Cabinet WorksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Reynolds v. USF Reddaway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Reynolds Metals v. ThrasherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API