Legal Opinion

Progressive Acquisition, Inc. v. Lytle

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 13, 1991No. 890587-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

Progressive Acquisition appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of Ezra and Mae Lytle. This case was initiated by Mountain Fuel in order to condemn an easement across property subject to a trust deed naming the Lytles as beneficiaries. Subsequent to the initiation of this suit, and prior to the award of the condemnation proceeds, the property was sold at trustee's sale. The trial court ruled that the trustee’s sale was valid and therefore awarded the entire condemnation proceeds to the Lytles as sole owners of the property. We affirm.

FACTS

The Lytles were the original…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Park City Utah Corp. v. Ensign Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Terry's Sales, Inc. v. Vander VeurUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Fred Meyer v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ArchambeauCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  2. Hermes Associates v. Park's SportsmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  3. Nyman v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  4. Iota v. Davco Management CompanyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  5. McKean v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API