Legal Opinion

Botts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1925No. A-4767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

Several assignments of error are presented in the brief of plaintiff in error, the first being that the information is insufficient. The charging part of the information is as follows:

“* * * That Abe Botts did * * * commit the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor in the manner and form as follows, to wit: That is to say that he, the said defendant, Abe Botts, did within said Latimer county and state of Oklahoma * * * willfully, wrongfully, have and keep in his possession about 160 gallons of intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky mash, the same then and there being a fermented and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FeebackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Ex Parte SpencerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Markinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Rutherford v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Pierson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. McCann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Hink v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API