Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1984No. C7-83-1810PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for burglary, entering an occupied dwelling without the consent of the person in lawful possession and with intent to commit a crime, Minn.Stat. § 609.58, subd. 2(2) (1982). He does not deny committing a trespass, entering a dwelling without consent of the owner, Minn.Stat. § 609.605(6) (1982), but he contends that evidence was insufficient to establish that his entry was with intent to commit any crime. Defendant also claims the trial court committed reversible error by granting the prosecutor’s motion to exclude testimony on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. KotkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. State v. HousleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Raleigh Ex Rel. Raleigh v. Independent School District No. 625Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. TiessenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. TotimehCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State v. St. CyrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API