Legal Opinion

Southold Savings Bank v. Fisher

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

Both parties moved for summary judgment in an action by the owner and holder of a bond -secured by a mortgage on real property to recover, among other items, 2% of the principal alleged to be due by virtue of section 1077-g of the Civil Practice Act. The bond dated December 22, 1925, in the principal sum of $12,000, was payable one year later with interest at 6% per annum. It contains a provision for the amortization of a portion of the principal over a period of five years. At the time of the commencement of the action the unpaid principal amounted to $7,625. The answer contains denials and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chase National Bank v. Guardian Realties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Johnson v. MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Union Trust Co. v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. White v. WielandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Johnson v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southold Savings Bank v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Southold Savings Bank v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API