Legal Opinion

Lemp v. Majkrzak

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 30, 2025No. 8:23-cv-00691Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MARIA MERCEDES LEMP, et al., * Plaintiffs, * v. * Civ. No. MJM-23-691 OFFICER MATTHEW MAJKRZAK, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM ORDER This matter is before the Court on Officer Majkrzak’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF 42) and Defendants’ Motion to Bifurcate Plaintiffs’ Monell Claim in Count Seven for Discovery and Trial (ECF 41). No hearing is necessary to resolve the motions. See Loc. R. 105.6 (D. Md. 2025). For reasons explained herein, Officer Majkrzak’s motion for partial dismissal is GRANTED, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API