Legal Opinion

Kade v. Smith

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 5, 2006No. 04-344PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Plaintiff Barry Kade appeals from a superior court judgment denying his request under the Public *555Records Act to compel disclosure of four performance evaluations pertaining to the Superintendent of the Northern State Correctional Facility in the City of Newport. Plaintiff contends the court erred in: (1) refusing to examine the requested documents in camera; (2) ruling that the records contain personal information exempt from disclosure; (3) failing to balance the competing interests in privacy and disclosure; and (4) declining to redact those portions of the records determined to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Young v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. Clymer v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rutland Herald v. Vermont State Police and Office of the Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  2. Rutland Herald v. City of Rutland and AFSCME Council 93, Local 1201Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  3. Sawyer v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. Bain v. Windham County Sheriff Keith ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. Rueger and Moyers v. Natural Resources Board and the District 9 Environmental Commission of the State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API